3.9
Developer priorities by diagnostic Rushcliffe
Developer priorities allow you to review the important aspects of your assessment from a technical view point. Typically, these priorities relate to changes that cannot be addressed by content editors easily.
Assessment completed on 01 Oct 2019 at 19:35 looking at http://www.rushcliffe.gov.uk/.
125 pages
221 pages in 10 documents
8 documents
None found
3 documents
Five slowest URLs by time to first byte
Top five accessibility issues
| Occurrences | What We Checked | |
|---|---|---|
| 869 | C22 : Using CSS to control visual presentation of text | |
| 367 | F70 : Failure of Success Criterion 4.1.1 due to incorrect use of start and end tags or attribute markup | |
| 367 | H74 : Ensuring that opening and closing tags are used according to specification | |
| 162 | F17 : Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 and 4.1.1 due to insufficient information in DOM to determine one-to-one relationships (e.g., between labels with same id) in HTML | |
| 162 | H93 : Ensuring that id attributes are unique on a Web page | |
Top five code quality issues
| Occurrences | What We Checked | |
|---|---|---|
| 999+ | Invalid attribute name | |
| 999+ | A "301 Moved Permanently" response was received | |
| 367 | A redundant close tag was found | |
| 227 | Invalid attribute value | |
| 9 | Fragment identifier not found | |